<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia &#8211; Is it credible and can we use it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.savvyteachers.com/2007/10/08/wikipedia-is-it-credible-and-can-we-use-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.savvyteachers.com/2007/10/08/wikipedia-is-it-credible-and-can-we-use-it/</link>
	<description>Helping Technology Work For You!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 13:59:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bradford Loza</title>
		<link>http://tech.savvyteachers.com/2007/10/08/wikipedia-is-it-credible-and-can-we-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Bradford Loza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.savvyteachers.com/2007/10/08/wikipedia-is-it-credible-and-can-we-use-it/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>wwhat a good blog you have.. thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wwhat a good blog you have.. thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Samuel Baklund</title>
		<link>http://tech.savvyteachers.com/2007/10/08/wikipedia-is-it-credible-and-can-we-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Baklund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 21:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.savvyteachers.com/2007/10/08/wikipedia-is-it-credible-and-can-we-use-it/#comment-178</guid>
		<description>I am not new to blogging and genuinely treasure your web site. There is much innovative subject that peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your web site and keep checking you out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not new to blogging and genuinely treasure your web site. There is much innovative subject that peaks my interest. I am going to bookmark your web site and keep checking you out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viral Notebook &#124; Michael M. Grant, Ph.D.</title>
		<link>http://tech.savvyteachers.com/2007/10/08/wikipedia-is-it-credible-and-can-we-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Viral Notebook &#124; Michael M. Grant, Ph.D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 08:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.savvyteachers.com/2007/10/08/wikipedia-is-it-credible-and-can-we-use-it/#comment-171</guid>
		<description>[...] to being accused of a heinous crime on the popular site. One supporter of Wikipedia, who wrote on Tech Savvy Teachers stated,” all sources (since they were created by people) can have errors and should be evaluated. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to being accused of a heinous crime on the popular site. One supporter of Wikipedia, who wrote on Tech Savvy Teachers stated,” all sources (since they were created by people) can have errors and should be evaluated. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://tech.savvyteachers.com/2007/10/08/wikipedia-is-it-credible-and-can-we-use-it/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tech.savvyteachers.com/2007/10/08/wikipedia-is-it-credible-and-can-we-use-it/#comment-8</guid>
		<description>I beleive Wikipedia IS trustworthy.    Just because it is written by non-academic researchers and the pages have not been checked by a publishing house editor, does not mean that the people who write the pages are uncreditable.  There are many ordinary people out there who are quite knowledgeable on what is going on in their world.  

Additionally, Wikipedia is good at presenting the truth when something is disputed by disclaiming it and then asking people to discuss and work out the facts.   When this happens, people update the articles.

The other thing I like about Wikipedia is that the pages on issues are very current and regularly updated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beleive Wikipedia IS trustworthy.    Just because it is written by non-academic researchers and the pages have not been checked by a publishing house editor, does not mean that the people who write the pages are uncreditable.  There are many ordinary people out there who are quite knowledgeable on what is going on in their world.  </p>
<p>Additionally, Wikipedia is good at presenting the truth when something is disputed by disclaiming it and then asking people to discuss and work out the facts.   When this happens, people update the articles.</p>
<p>The other thing I like about Wikipedia is that the pages on issues are very current and regularly updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.202 seconds -->

